Ricominciano da oggi, 20 ottobre, le lezioni online della seconda edizione del NATO Social Media User Online Course sponsorizzato dall’Allied Command Transformation (ACT) della NATO.
Dopo il successo della prima edizione, svoltasi a partire dal mese di febbraio di quest’anno, ora si fa il bis con questo corso del tutto innovativo ideato per i militari e i civili appartenenti alle organizzazioni di sicurezza e Difesa e focalizzato sull’addestramento all’uso dei social media per il personale NATO e proveniente da paesi NATO.
Si tratta di una opportunità del tutto free che richiede solo una registrazione per poter accedere alle lezioni online, al forum specificamente ideato per la discussione degli argomenti trattati, all’area esercizi e alla sessione live con gli istruttori, dove è possibile rivolgere direttamente le proprie domande a chi ha tenuto ogni lezione.
I casi di studio presentati in questa edizione sono concentrati su Ucraina e ISIS. A termine corso il certificato di partecipazione anche per chi interessato solo alla parte teorica.
Il progetto di un corso online specifico sull’uso dei social media nel senso più ampio del significato, dalla narrative passando attraverso la sicurezza fino alla gestione delle crisi comunicative, è stato dettato dall’evoluzione dell’uso del web ed è stato reso possibile da un progetto risalente a oltre un anno e mezzo fa in seno all’ACT NATO che ha riunito più di un centinaio di persone e una decina di istruttori con relativi assistenti.
Per iscriversi, seguire le lezioni e avere maggiori info clic su Innovation Hub.
Upon my arrival, on March 2014, I had the impression of being behind the front line of a war.
At Henri Coanda International Airport, there were hundreds of U.S. soldiers moving to the north of Romania, and they weren’t going on holidays, that is for sure.
My first walk in Bucharest was to Palatul Parlamentului and I saw the NATO flag waving near the Romanian and the European flag, in my whole life I had never seen such a thing anywhere. These are just a few examples about what the Romanian attitude is towards the new International situation.
After 2004 Romania became one of the most important strategic partners of the Alliance in the Black Sea region and today represents the pivot for all American actions in Ukraine, not only military actions but also economic and, above all, diplomatic.
It is particular to note that all political parties approve of the function of their country; Romanian political history is full of disagreements, also today the relations between the President of the Republic, Traian Basescu, and the Prime Minister, Victor Ponta, are highly charged but in Foreign Affairs it is impossible to find a politician that is against U.S. policy and supports the Russians.
Of course, the communist past of the country represents a nightmare and a Russian reinforcement is seen as a warning but this doesn’t explain the current situation at all.
Probably Romanian will is to become the European bastion against the Russian neo-imperialism but not for an idealistic reason but for a pragmatic program; above all to reinforce their control over Moldavia, and, in the long run, the reunion of Romania and Moldavia under Bucharest.
Romania has made important efforts to preserve its presence in Moldavia, through the construction of schools and cultural facilities, a clear example of “public diplomacy” and by advocating that Moldavia will join the European Union.
Regarding economic aspects, Romania hasn’t been touched by the sanctions to Russia, its most important partners are Germany, Italy and Hungary, so Romania can continue to be inflexible without facing any exporting problems.
It will be important for the International Community to consider how much Romania is involved and trusted in European and Atlantic project or is it simply a free rider that is trying to use the situation to obtain political and economic advantages.
In November/December 2014, the presidential elections will take place; regardless of the winner, we are quite sure that Romania’s ambitious foreign policy to revamp its position with NATO and EU and to revive past dreams will continue.
With the southern area of Eastern Europe causing worry and trepidation for many Chancellor’s offices around the world, and the whispering of so-called political encounters and negotiations (both public and private) have not helped to ease tensions, USA and its Allied war machine are heating up its motors.
If worldwide opinion is fully aware of Russia’s military exercises causing worry and fears, the manoeuvres and exercises by the Allied forces are a well-kept secret. Since the middle of March, in the areas situated near Ukraine, military and air force exercises has been regularly conducted by American, Romanian, Polish and Bulgarian military forces.
The first important military exercise took place in the Black Sea area on March 12th and involved the destroyer USS Truxtun, the warship Queen Mary, escorted by Romanian corvettes, Vice Admiral Eugeiu Rosca and Second Admiral Eustatiu Sebastian, and by the Bulgarian battleship Darzki.
This line-up may appear modest, if we take into consideration the forces that Russia can count upon in its naval base in Sebastopol; where Russia boasts a submarine, a cruiser, two destroyers, two battleships and an air float of 22 Sukhoi 24M and the famous Soviet Sukhoi 24 attack aircraft.
Regardless of this fact, the presence of four naval units from three different nations has evoked upsetting feelings for various reasons. First of all, the Romanian naval base of Constanta, situated 220 nautical miles from Sebastopol has become the departure port of operations. Furthermore and above all, the presence of a task force which includes the American air-craft carrier, George Bush, escorted by destroyers, Roosevelt and Philippine Sea, with 1700 marines and 90 Hornet and Superhornet all placed near the River Bosforo has evoked tension and worries.
Taking into consideration all these factors, one can understand the feelings of extreme anxiety and worry in Russian military and information sectors. These feelings can be summarized in the English foreign affairs journal Russian Global Affairs Director, Mr Fyodor Lukyaov. In a statement to Reuters, Mr Lukyav affirmed that concerning American provocations, Mr Putin has every reason to be concerned about the Russian float in Sebastopol.
The exercises terminated at the end of March, however the tense situation in the Black Sea area has not been placated. On Sunday, April 13th, Romanian President, Mr Traian Basescu, visited the American destroyer, Donald Cook (which had been patrolling Romanian waters in the Black Sea since April 1st) and declared that he and his country opposed Putin’s political stance. During his visit on board, a Russian attack aircraft, the Sukhoi 24M, circled twelve times at a low altitude causing tension to the personnel on board while counter measures in case of an air raid were activated. Subsequently, this act was condemned harshly by the Pentagon that defined the action as a provocation without precedence and against all military protocol.
If the Black Sea area has been a hot spot during these last few weeks, the situation in the Eastern European skies is not much better. Meanwhile, during the last two weeks of March, American and Polish aviation have been carrying out joint operation actions. If, at the beginning of the crisis in the Crimean area joint operations had been foreseen only for the bombers, the Polish command has now asked for twelve F16s to be sent over. These aircrafts are not only able to respond to air fire, but they can also be used as fighter-bombers and reconnaissance aircraft. Simultaneously, with the end of the operations, the Commander of the American Air Force in Europe has received orders to set up patrols along the borders of Polish, Romanian and Ukrainian air space using planes equipped with Airborne Warning and Control Systems. The decision was confirmed by US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel during a press conference on 18th April.
The picture that is emerging seems to be quite evident. Some NATO nations and the United States are gearing up to react to whatever scenario may appear on the horizon. On one hand, diplomacy is being used, thus taking on the role of Protectorate of regional order, while on the other the forces are getting ready to show Moscow that in case the stakes get higher, they are ready to take counter measures regarding the whole area and in a very vast arena. In this “match”, Washington will be aided by its Eastern European allies, in particular Romania and Poland that have realized that they will have the opportunity to play an active role as real regional powers. It is important to remember that the Romanian authorities, in particular, are pressuring the American military forces to maintain a stable and constant presence of NATO forces in Romania, in particular it is important to consider the political efforts made by the former Romanian minister of Foreign Affairs, Mircea Geoana (he was minister in 2004 when Romania joined the NATO).
This pressure received tangible results on March 27th when the American government formally pointed out the need to reinforce American presence in the Air Force base of Kogalniceanu near Constanta. By the end of April, 1600 Marines airborne trained will be sent to the Romanian military base. With this increase of this contingent, an increase in logistic support, particularly, amphibious operation ships are also foreseen. These are all signs that let the reader understand that the game in Eastern Europe is still a long way from being over.
The difficulties in being the most powerful man on earth
By Giovanni Pallotta
Today’s international political stage is now dominated by the figure of the President of the Russian Federation, Vladmir Vladimirovic Putin. His power has been written about more than once in various magazines and newspapers, and he was crowned as the most powerful man on Earth by Forbes magazine. All this publicity serves as proof of how much appeal the ex-army colonel of KGB has on international media and political affairs. Meanwhile, the non- presence of the figure of the American President Barack Obama seems to stand out as well. When Obama was elected to his first term in 2008, he was identified as the universal figure of American “rebirth”, hailed as a new “Roosevelt.” Today, however at a distance of only six years, Obama appears at a first glance, much more similar to Jimmy Carter, confused and involved in situations that are bigger than he is.
So, what has happened to Obama since 2008 on the American and international political scene to downcast the President from a leader of New World Order to a weak leader in comparison to the actions taken by his Russian counterpart?
First of all, we must keep in mind the United States internal political situation; the five year period from 2008-2013 in terms of the American economy was the worst since the Great Depression of 1929. Furthermore, the country had to bear two military situations (Iraq and Afghanistan) both inherited from the previous Bush administration with its doctrine of “preventative” attacks.
Obama’s first major intervention regarded setting his nation back on track by concentrating on American economic/work issues, while at the same time trying to gear his nation towards a health system worthy of a developed and modern nation as the United States . As we remember, “Obamacare” angered and infuriated many of the Republicans and Conservatives.
Regarding this aforementioned aspect, the Obama administration has to be considered successful. His administration, succeeded with only one mandate, to turn his nation around and have the USA become once again the locomotive of the world.
Bearing his internal relations success in mind, why is Obama regarded as a basically “weak” leader by the rest of the world? In my opinion for one very simple reason. Often the real role of the American President that is to say the leader of his nation and its citizens is ignored by international public opinion. On the contrary, international public opinion tends to consider the resident of the White House as a sort of “world guardian or keeper,” who has to have among his responsibilities that of maintaining international peace. This opinion could not be more mistaken!! The resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue has only one thing at heart, that is to say the interest of his own nation and its citizens to whom the President is bond. All the rest is Cold War Rhetoric spiced up with Clintonian tones.
For this reason, every sort of criminal act (paid killings and the murder of ethnic groups) carried out by Putin and his administration is casually “not seen”. However if Obama should decide to carry out military retaliation or action, he will be considered as a “hawk” thus supportive of the previous the Bush administration strategy. On the other hand, if the President of the United States should deem not to start upon a risky war operation, then he will be tagged as weak. Whatever Mr. Obama and his administration may decide to do, the choice is not easy and it is not a simple task to be on the winning side of international public opinion.
I 28 ambasciatori del Consiglio Atlantico (NAC, North Atlantic Council) sono riuniti a Bruxelles per discutere sul tema dell’Ucraina. Sono stati convocati urgentemente in seguito al peggiorare della situazione e agli ultimi sviluppi nella penisola di Crimea.
A rendere noto il meeting di emergenza è stato il Segretario generale della NATO, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, con un tweet nella tarda serata di ieri, sabato 1° marzo : “Gli alleati NATO si coordinano da vicino sulla grave situazione in Ucraina. Il North Atlantic Council si riunirà domani [oggi, ndr] seguito dalla Commissione NATO-Ucraina” (@AndersFoghR)
Il NAC rappresenta l’organo politico decisionale principale della NATO. Riunisce gli alti rappresentanti degli stati membri per discutere tutte le questioni relative alla politica e alle attività operative che richiedono una decisione collegiale e che riguardano pace, sicurezza e stabilità. Ogni membro ha uguali diritti di espressione e di condivisione, le decisioni vengono assunte all’unanimità.
La Commissione NATO-Ucraina (NUC) è stata stabilita nel 1997 ed è responsabile dello sviluppo della relazione con la NATO e delle attività di cooperazione. Rappresenta il forum di discussione con i membri NATO in rapporto alle tematiche di sicurezza di interesse comune.